Japan crisis sparks review of Europe nuclear projects

Japan crisis sparks review of Europe nuclear projects

Areas affected by the quake in Japan. Photo credit: USGS
Nuclear projects in Europe are being reviewed in light of the emergency in Japan, sparked by a massive earthquake and tsunami.

The German and the Swiss governments have suspended decisions on their nuclear programmes, and the European Commission is holding a meeting of ministers and experts on Tuesday.

A nuclear plant in Fukushima has been hit by a third explosion in four days. The blast occurred at reactor 2 at the Fukushima Daiichi plant – 250km (155 miles) north-east of Tokyo – which engineers had been trying to stabilise after two other reactors exploded.

Thousands of people are believed to have died following Friday’s 9.0-magnitude quake and tsunami. Millions are spending a fourth night without water, food, electricity or gas and more than 500,000 people have been left homeless.

BBC Europe correspondent Chris Morris, in Brussels, said some of the decisions now being made in Europe were motivated by politics.

In Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel has suspended an agreement to extend the life of Germany’s nuclear power stations, there are important state elections looming.

Tens of thousands of anti-nuclear activists demonstrated at the weekend against plans to extend the life of Germany’s reactors. Protesters in Stuttgart formed a human chain reaching 45km (27 miles) for the event, which had been planned before the current nuclear crisis in Japan because it was already a key election issue.

‘No favours’

Meanwhile the Swiss government has delayed decisions on new nuclear plants there, and an Austrian minister has called for new safety tests on nuclear reactors across the continent.

Anti-nuclear Austria also has long-standing concerns about the safety of nuclear plants in former communist countries on its borders, said our correspondent. “But there is also real concern about the lessons from the Japanese earthquake.” Mrs Merkel had conceded that, following events in Japan, it was not possible to “go back to business as usual”, he said.

“The reaction may be a temporary one – much will depend on how the crisis in Japan is resolved. But – as Europe seeks to remove carbon based fuels from its economy – there is a long term debate about finding the right mix between nuclear energy and energy generated from renewable sources. There’s no doubt that the events of the last few days haven’t done the nuclear industry any favours,” he added.

On Tuesday the European Commission will host a meeting of energy ministers and nuclear experts in Brussels, to assess nuclear safety issues. The commission said responsibility for the safety of nuclear power lay primarily with individual member states. But with nearly 150 nuclear reactors across the continent, it wanted to take stock of events in Japan, and review safety measures.

Many governments are cautious about immediate decisions, pointing out at that most of Europe is far less seismically active than Japan, said Chris Morris.

UK Energy Secretary Chris Huhne said lessons needed to be learned that were based on the facts. That could include employing much more caution on where nuclear plants are sited.

“Frankly there are enormous differences but we have to learn everything we can from the Japanese experience to make sure if there was any human error, if there was any regulatory slip up, if there was anything we can learn we will learn it because safety is our number one concern,” he told the BBC.

Following the latest explosion in Japan there were fears of a meltdown. Radiation levels near the plant rose, and staff working at the reactor 2 were evacuated.

On Monday, a hydrogen blast at the Fukushima Daiichi’s reactor 3 injured 11 people and destroyed the building surrounding it. It followed a blast at reactor 1 on Saturday.

Meanwhile, the relief operation is continuing in the north-east. About 2,000 bodies were found washed ashore on beaches in Miyagi prefecture on Monday, in which officials estimate that 10,000 people have died. About 1,000 were found on the Ojika peninsula and another 1,000 in the town of Minamisanriku, which was flattened by the tsunami. Thousands are still unaccounted for – including hundreds of tourists – while many remote towns and villages remain cut off.

Reprinted from: BBC


One thought on “Japan crisis sparks review of Europe nuclear projects

  1. It is St.Patrick’s Day for me- it means Green!

    Did Patrick use much energy? I am sure his ecological footprint was small; even his carbon quota was low. In his days forest covered most of Ireland of the fourth century, living as most people did until sixty or seventy years ago.

    But now with the real threat of nuclear meltdowns in northeastern Japan, to be followed by radiation levels and vast stretches of land which are threatened to be NO GO areas for many decades, are we going to change our economic systems!
    It seems the desire for money drives a continued growth of consumption of our resources.

    The policy of most countries is to stimulate consumption which seems to be the cure for poverty and the path to prosperity. What do we teach for the fullness of life.

    What then is to be the cry of ecologists! Live simple!? Live within the confines of an agricultural society? With our huge population, mega cities are to increase! Show then the way!!! Thanks giving, living as children of God, respecting others and God’s creation.

    Tell me more.

    Harold Naylor Hong Kong

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *